The Oilman Gushes about Renewable Energy

Ron Loch
May 26th, 2010

WINDPOWER 2010 is bringing some surprising perspectives to the podium in Dallas,  including those of former President George W. Bush who delivered a keynote address at the convention.

Given that he was mostly characterized as an oilman during his time in the White House, it was interesting to listen to President Bush speak passionately about renewable energy.

As governor of Texas he created incentives for the development of wind energy, and today Texas is the top state in wind power generation. 

When I walk around the exhibit hall there are a lot of companies that share his communications challenge. Many have built their brands in the fossil fuel industry and are now making significant capital investments in wind.  

It will take a concerted communications effort to make sure they get the credit they deserve and are seen as advocates of this important industry.  

That will not only help these companies, but also help the industry get the attention of policy makers.

(Guest contributor Ron Loch is a senior vice president at Gibbs & Soell Public Relations. He leads the firm’s Greentech & Sustainability Practice, collaborating with G&S colleagues specializing in advanced manufacturing and energy, agribusiness and food, consumer lifestyle and building solutions, professional services, and technology and general science.)

Industry with a Wind in its Sails

Ron Loch
May 25th, 2010

A hot wind is blowing in Dallas and it has nothing to do with the 90+ temperatures.  I’m at WINDPOWER 2010 and there’s no mistaking an industry on the move.  

This year’s conference has 200 more exhibitors than last year’s and attendance is expected to approach 20,000. Conversations on the floor are consistent with the Wind Industry Monitor poll – the industry in the U.S. needs a boost from a clear energy policy. There is particular support of a Renewable Electricity Standard

However, judging by the booths and traffic, companies are not taking a “wait-and-see” attitude.  They are obviously investing in sales and marketing judging by the size and complexity of the booths.  

Balancing the need for energy policy advocacy and immediate sales seems to be the most pressing communications issue they face.

(Guest contributor Ron Loch is a senior vice president at Gibbs & Soell Public Relations. He leads the firm’s Greentech & Sustainability Practice, collaborating with G&S colleagues specializing in advanced manufacturing and energy, agribusiness and food, consumer lifestyle and building solutions, professional services, and technology and general science.)

I’m with Team Coco

Brian Hall
May 24th, 2010

There were several reports in the May 17 issue of Time that had intriguing PR and communications angles.

One of the best wasn’t the cover article on BP’s disaster in the Gulf. It was actually the shorter article about Conan O’Brien in which the sub-head said it all: “In the niche-media era, it’s not just the size of your audience – it’s how intensely they care.”

To me, Conan’s communications approach provides a perfect case study of how a nimble competitor who understands today’s media landscape can out-battle slower-moving Goliaths who are still trying to appeal to a mass audience. As the article states:

“The way O’Brien’s path is diverging from Leno’s raises the question: What does it mean to be a media star today? Is it about household viewers or Twitter followers? Breadth or depth? Mass appeal or cult appeal? (TV ad money is focused on under-50 demographics, so the right cult audience can outsize influence.) Conan and TBS are betting it is better to have a smaller group of fans who care intensely about what you do than a bigger number who care just enough to not change the channel. It doesn’t apply only to comedians. More people watch Brian Williams every night than Glenn Beck; that doesn’t make Williams more influential.” 

The same concept applies to both B2C and B2B PR and communications. With the rise of blogs, social media, YouTube, podcasts, Web seminars and other channels, we have more tools than ever to target our exact audience and forge strong relationships with them.

Those who do will build a loyal following, while those who are still measuring success via broad audience numbers probably spend way too much only to get left behind.

You rock, Coco!

Greentech: Engine vs. Bandwagon Jumper

Ron Loch
May 19th, 2010

Michael Kanellos at Greentech Media wrote a great perspective earlier this month, “Why There is No Google of Green,” where he provides eight reasons why the greentech revolution is different than the Internet. 

While he’s spot-on about the reasons why there’s a difference, the fact he felt compelled to write the piece has me concerned.  

He writes that not a week goes by that someone doesn’t ask the question, “Where is the Google of green?”  Couple that with statements by corporate executives and venture capitalists that greentech will be “larger than the Internet” – and greentech has the hallmarks of a bandwagon.  

The greentech and renewable energy space is decades old, and it’s certainly seen its share of advancements and setbacks.  In fact, few people realize that in the early 1900s electric cars outnumbered gasoline automobiles.

What’s currently fueling the excitement among market watchers are recent developments, including the approval of the first U.S. large scale, offshore wind farm, the proposed Senate climate and energy bill, and a worldwide recognition that we must control carbon emissions.

That’s great because it attracts more investment. But, on the flip-side, you inevitably have an influx of service providers looking to exploit early stage enthusiasm to maximize short-term income.   

As new technologies approach commercialization, they often get a second look by the supply chain which can lead to a “too-good-to-be-true” narrative.

Companies in the greentech space need partners – whether lawyers, business consultants or communications agencies – that can navigate them through the challenges that inevitably follow launch to ensure they prosper and succeed.

After all, every bandwagon will have its share of jumpers, but they do nothing to move the float forward.  For that, you need an engine.  

That’s the thinking behind the recent announcement from Gibbs & Soell about our new greentech and sustainability practice. It’s an engine powered by a depth of client experience with clean technologies and sustainable practices.

Check us out, and contact me at rloch@gibbs-soell.com or (847) 519-9150 to learn more about our work.

(Guest contributor Ron Loch is a senior vice president at Gibbs & Soell Public Relations. He leads the firm’s Greentech & Sustainability Practice, collaborating with G&S colleagues specializing in advanced manufacturing and energy, agribusiness and food, consumer lifestyle and building solutions, professional services, and technology and general science.)

PowerPoint Makes Us Stupid

Brian Hall
May 4th, 2010

I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry when I read recently in the New York Times that PowerPoint was causing huge productivity and communication issues for the U.S. military.

“PowerPoint makes us stupid,” declared Gen. James N. Mattis of the Marine Corps.

However, senior military officers did see a value for the slides when the intended goal is to obscure information. “The news media sessions often last 25 minutes, with 5 minutes left at the end for questions from anyone still awake,” is how the article described some press briefings. 

Of course we all know these same issues hold true in the corporate world as well.

How many times have you sat through a 30-minute presentation in which the slides contained all text and bullets that allowed the speaker to go on auto-pilot?

Or a show and tell from techies who want their work deliberately shrouded in mystery in order to maintain their hero status?

As communications pros, we all know all too well the faults of PowerPoint – or perhaps more accurately how most executives are using it. But, how do we overcome this when it is so ingrained in most corporate cultures?

One answer was served up over drinks with a few folks after work one night. Actually, it was underneath the drinks.

One colleague pointed me in the direction of a really fun article about great ideas (and some folk lore) that originated through drawings or notes on cocktail napkins, among other things.

And while we laughed at first, the more we thought about it, the more the “cocktail napkin” concept makes sense for PowerPoint.

We thought of two basic rules:

  1. For images, graphics, etc., they should be simple enough that you could have drawn them on a cocktail napkin yourself (or at least sketched them out).
  2. For text, never put more on a slide than you could write legibly on a cocktail napkin.

Here’s an example of the idea at work.

Remember Tim Russert’s “Florida! Florida! Florida!” whiteboard from the 2000 Presidential Election? It’s now housed at the Smithsonian Institution.

So maybe there’s something to the cocktail napkin strategy.

Or are we just spending too many nights enjoying Happy Hour a little too much?